William
Kovarik |
Fuels and Society C: 14. Impact of Catalytic Converters on Auto Manufacturers |
||||
|
Back to: Start
|
Did the benefits of catalytic converters justify their costs? And just how much were Americans willing to pay for cleaner air? While public opinion polls showed tremendous support for environmental cleanup in general, the auto and oil industries were alarmed that the regulatory approach taken by Congress was to mandate the details of their pollution controls. By 1972, GM and other automakers were asking for delays in the schedule for introducing cars with catalytic converters. The Commerce Department warned against rigid deadlines and an industry group, the Chamber of Commerce, worried that "entire industries might collapse" because of the economic effects of the new anti-pollution laws. Around this time, GM estimated that catalytic converters and other pollution controls would raise the price of a car by two percent. Ford and Chrysler estimated that it would cost an additional five percent. By 1980, the cost of air pollution equipment (catalytic converter, oxygen sensor and other items) turned out to be around $222 per car, or less than two percent. Other associated costs (such as mileage penalty, higher cost of unleaded gasoline) were estimated at an additional $684 over the life of the car. These costs nearly doubled when EPA standards for allowable carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides(NOx) were cut in half the next year. (Crandall, 1986) As it turned out, the auto industry did not collapse under the weight of the regulations, and in fact, the health benefits of reducing lead alone were estimated in 1985 to be worth 10 to 13 times the cost, or at least $17 billion per year. (EPA, 1985). (See Lead Phase Out). U.S. EPA. 1985. Costs and Benefits of Reducing Lead in Gasoline: Final Regulatory Impact Analysis. EPA-23005-85-006. Office of Policy Analysis, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Freeman, A. Myrick, Air and Water Pollution Control: A Cost Benefit Analysis (New York: Wiley, 1982).
Krupnick, Alan J. and Paul R. Portney, "Controlling urban air pollution: a benefit-cost assessment," Science, April 26, 1991 v252 n5005 p522(7)
Miller, Peter and John Moffet, The Price of Mobility: Uncovering the Hidden Costs of Transportation (Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Defense Council and Resource Futures International, October 1993), http://solstice.crest.org/efficiency/nrdc/mobility/airpollu.html#RTFToC55
|
||||
| College of Science and Mathematics Kennesaw State University 1000 Chastain Rd. Kennesaw, GA 30114 770-423-6160 |
|